Paper detail

Lithium in the closest satellite of our Milky Way

Recently, we studied the chemical evolution of lithium in the thin disc of the Milky Way. We found that the best agreement with the observed Li abundances in the thin disc is obtained considering novae as the main source of lithium. We assumed a delay time of ~1 Gyr for nova production and an effective 7Li yield of 1.8($\pm$0.6)x10$^{-5}$ Msun over the whole nova lifetime. The possibility to check our detailed assumptions on lithium production on other stellar systems, such as the satellites of our Milky Way, is seriously hampered by their distance from us. In these systems dwarf stars (where the original lithium can be measured) are too faint to detect lithium lines. However, thanks to the Gaia mission, it was recently possible to disentangle the stars of a disrupted dwarf galaxy in the Galactic halo (called Enceladus or Galactic sausage). Adopting a chemical evolution model tuned to match the metallicity distribution function of Enceladus stars, we present our predictions for the lithium abundance of the stars of this disrupted galaxy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.