Paper detail

Lithium depletion and angular momentum transport in solar-type stars

Transport processes occurring in the radiative interior of solar-type stars are evidenced by the surface variation of light elements, in particular Li, and the evolution of their rotation rates. For the Sun, inversions of helioseismic data indicate that the radial profile of angular velocity in its radiative zone is nearly uniform, which implies the existence of angular momentum transport mechanisms. While there are many independent transport models for angular momentum and chemical species, there is a lack of self-consistent theories that permit stellar evolution models to simultaneously match the present-day observations of solar lithium abundances and radial rotation profiles. We explore how additional transport processes can improve the agreement between evolutionary models of rotating stars and observations. We constrain the resulting models by simultaneously using the evolution of the surface rotation rate and Li abundance in the solar-type stars of open clusters, and the solar surface and internal rotation profile as inverted from helioseismology. We show the relevance of penetrative convection for the depletion of Li. The rotational dependence of the depth of penetrative convection yields an anti-correlation between the initial rotation rate and Li depletion in our models of solar-type stars that is in agreement with the observed trend. Simultaneously, the addition of an ad hoc vertical viscosity leads to efficient transport of angular momentum between the core and the envelope. We also self-consistently compute for the first time the thickness of the tachocline and find that it is compatible with helioseismic estimations. However, the main sequence depletion of Li in solar-type stars is only reproduced when adding a parametric turbulent mixing below the convective envelope. The need for additional transport processes in stellar evolution models is confirmed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.