Paper detail

Lithium abundance in the globular cluster M4: from the Turn-Off to the RGB Bump

We present Li and Fe abundances for 87 stars in the GC M4,obtained with GIRAFFE high-resolution spectra. The targets range from the TO up to the RGB Bump. The Li abundance in the TO stars is uniform, with an average value A(Li)=2.30+-0.02 dex,consistent with the upper envelope of Li content measured in other GCs and in the Halo stars,confirming also for M4 the discrepancy with the primordial Li abundance predicted by WMAP+BBNS. The iron content of M4 is [Fe/H]=-1.10+-0.01 dex, with no systematic offsets between dwarf and giant stars.The behaviour of the Li and Fe abundance along the entire evolutionary path is incompatible with models with atomic diffusion, pointing out that an additional turbulent mixing below the convective region needs to be taken into account,able to inhibit the atomic diffusion.The measured A(Li) and its homogeneity in the TO stars allow to put strong constraints on the shape of the Li profile inside the M4 TO stars. The global behaviour of A(Li) with T_{eff} can be reproduced with different pristine Li abundances, depending on the kind of adopted turbulent mixing.One cannot reproduce the global trend starting from the WMAP+BBNS A(Li) and adopting the turbulent mixing described by Richard et al.(2005) with the same efficiency used by Korn et al.(2006) to explain the Li content in NGC6397. Such a solution is not able to well reproduce simultaneously the Li abundance observed in TO and RGB stars.Otherwise, theWMAP+BBNS A(Li) can be reproduced assuming a more efficient turbulent mixing able to reach deeper stellar regions where the Li is burned. The cosmological Li discrepancy cannot be easily solved with the present,poor understanding of the turbulence in the stellar interiors and a future effort to well understand the true nature of this non-canonical process is needed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.