Paper detail

Literature Triage on Genomic Variation Publications by Knowledge-enhanced Multi-channel CNN

Background: To investigate the correlation between genomic variation and certain diseases or phenotypes, the fundamental task is to screen out the concerning publications from massive literature, which is called literature triage. Some knowledge bases, including UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot and NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog are created for collecting concerning publications. These publications are manually curated by experts, which is time-consuming. Moreover, the manual curation of information from literature is not scalable due to the rapidly increasing amount of publications. In order to cut down the cost of literature triage, machine-learning models were adopted to automatically identify biomedical publications. Methods: Comparing to previous studies utilizing machine-learning models for literature triage, we adopt a multi-channel convolutional network to utilize rich textual information and meanwhile bridge the semantic gaps from different corpora. In addition, knowledge embeddings learned from UMLS is also used to provide extra medical knowledge beyond textual features in the process of triage. Results: We demonstrate that our model outperforms the state-of-the-art models over 5 datasets with the help of knowledge embedding and multiple channels. Our model improves the accuracy of biomedical literature triage results. Conclusions: Multiple channels and knowledge embeddings enhance the performance of the CNN model in the task of biomedical literature triage. Keywords: Literature Triage; Knowledge Embedding; Multi-channel Convolutional Network

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.