Paper detail

List-decoding of binary Goppa codes up to the binary Johnson bound

We study the list-decoding problem of alternant codes, with the notable case of classical Goppa codes. The major consideration here is to take into account the size of the alphabet, which shows great influence on the list-decoding radius. This amounts to compare the \emph{generic} Johnson bound to the \emph{$q$-ary} Johnson bound. This difference is important when $q$ is very small. Essentially, the most favourable case is $q=2$, for which the decoding radius is greatly improved, notably when the relative minimum distance gets close to 1/2. Even though the announced result, which is the list-decoding radius of binary Goppa codes, is new, it can be rather easily made up from previous sources (V. Guruswami, R. M. Roth and I. Tal, R .M. Roth), which may be a little bit unknown, and in which the case of binary Goppa codes has apparently not been thought at. Only D. J. Bernstein treats the case of binary Goppa codes in a preprint. References are given in the introduction. We propose an autonomous treatment and also a complexity analysis of the studied algorithm, which is quadratic in the blocklength $n$, when decoding at some distance of the relative maximum decoding radius, and in $O(n^7)$ when reaching the maximum radius.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.