Paper detail

List coloring the square of sparse graphs with large degree

We consider the problem of coloring the squares of graphs of bounded maximum average degree, that is, the problem of coloring the vertices while ensuring that two vertices that are adjacent or have a common neighbour receive different colors. Borodin et al. proved in 2004 and 2008 that the squares of planar graphs of girth at least seven and sufficiently large maximum degree $Δ$ are list $(Δ+1)$-colorable, while the squares of some planar graphs of girth six and arbitrarily large maximum degree are not. By Euler&#39;s Formula, planar graphs of girth at least $6$ are of maximum average degree less than $3$, and planar graphs of girth at least $7$ are of maximum average degree less than $14/5<3$. We strengthen their result and prove that there exists a function $f$ such that the square of any graph with maximum average degree $m<3$ and maximum degree $Δ\geq f(m)$ is list $(Δ+1)$-colorable. This bound of $3$ is optimal in the sense that the above-mentioned planar graphs with girth $6$ have maximum average degree less than $3$ and arbitrarily large maximum degree, while their square cannot be $(Δ+1)$-colored. The same holds for list injective $Δ$-coloring.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.