Paper detail

List-coloring the Square of a Subcubic Graph

The {\em square} $G^2$ of a graph $G$ is the graph with the same vertex set as $G$ and with two vertices adjacent if their distance in $G$ is at most 2. Thomassen showed that every planar graph $G$ with maximum degree $Δ(G)=3$ satisfies $χ(G^2)\leq 7$. Kostochka and Woodall conjectured that for every graph, the list-chromatic number of $G^2$ equals the chromatic number of $G^2$, that is $χ_l(G^2)=χ(G^2)$ for all $G$. If true, this conjecture (together with Thomassen's result) implies that every planar graph $G$ with $Δ(G)=3$ satisfies $χ_l(G^2)\leq 7$. We prove that every connected graph (not necessarily planar) with $Δ(G)=3$ other than the Petersen graph satisfies $χ_l(G^2)\leq 8$ (and this is best possible). In addition, we show that if $G$ is a planar graph with $Δ(G)=3$ and girth $g(G)\geq 7$, then $χ_l(G^2)\leq 7$. Dvořák, Škrekovski, and Tancer showed that if $G$ is a planar graph with $Δ(G) = 3$ and girth $g(G) \geq 10$, then $χ_l(G^2)\leq 6$. We improve the girth bound to show that if $G$ is a planar graph with $Δ(G)=3$ and $g(G) \geq 9$, then $χ_l(G^2) \leq 6$. All of our proofs can be easily translated into linear-time coloring algorithms.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.