Paper detail

Liquid-phase epitaxy of neutron star crusts and white dwarf cores

Near-equilibrium bottom-up crystallization of fully-ionized neutron star crusts or white dwarf cores is considered. We argue that this process is similar to liquid-phase epitaxial (i.e. preserving order of previous layers) crystal growth or crystal pulling from melt in Earth laboratories whereby lateral positions of newly crystallizing ions are anchored by already solidified layers. Their vertical positions are set by charge neutrality. Consequently, interplane spacing of a growing crystal either gradually increases, tracing $n_\mathrm{e}$ decrease, as the crystallization front moves away from the stellar center, or decreases, tracing decrease of $\langle Z \rangle$, when the crystallization front crosses a boundary between layers of different compositions. This results in a formation of stretched Coulomb crystals, in contrast to the standard assumption of cubic crystal formation, which is based on energetics arguments but does not take into account growth kinetics. Overstretched crystals break, which limits the vertical sizes of growing crystallites. We study breaking shear strain and effective shear modulus of stretched matter and discuss possibility of macrocrystallite formation. The latter has interesting astrophysical implications, for instance, appearance of weak crustal layers, whose strength may increase by a few orders of magnitude upon breaking and refreezing at a late-time event. We also analyze interaction of adjacent Coulomb crystals, having different ion compositions, and estimate the strength of such interfaces.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.