Paper detail

Linking Stakeholders' Viewpoint Concerns and Microservices-based Architecture

Widespread adoption of agile project management, independent delivery with microservices, and automated deployment with DevOps has tremendously speedup the systems development. The real game-changer is continuous integration (CI), continuous delivery, and continuous deployment (CD). Organizations can do multiple releases a day, shortening the test, release, and deployment cycles from weeks to minutes. Maturity of container technologies like Docker and container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes has promoted microservices architecture, especially in the cloud-native developments. Various tools are available for setting up CI/CD pipelines. Organizations are moving away from monolith applications and moving towards microservices-based architectures. Organizations can quickly accumulate hundreds of such microservices accessible via application programming interfaces (APIs). The primary purpose of these modern methodologies is agility, speed, and reusability. While DevOps offers speed and time to market, agility and reusability may not be guaranteed unless microservices and API's are linked to enterprise-wide stakeholders' needs. The link between business needs and microservices/APIs is not well captured nor adequately defined. In this publication, we describe a structured method to create a logical link among APIs and microservices-based agile developments with enterprise stakeholders' needs and viewpoint concerns. This method enables capturing and documenting enterprise-wide stakeholders' needs, whether these are business owners, planners (product owners, architects), designers (developers, DevOps engineers), or the partners and subscribers of an enterprise.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.