Paper detail

Linking soft excess in ultraluminous X-ray sources with optically thick wind driven by supercritical accretion

Supercritical accretion onto compact objects may drive massive winds that are nearly spherical, optically thick, and Eddington limited. Blackbody emission from the photosphere is the direct observational signature of the wind. Here we investigate whether or not it can explain the soft emission component seen in the energy spectra of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs). Based on high-quality XMM-Newton spectra of 15 ULXs, we find that the soft component can be modeled as blackbody emission with a nearly constant luminosity, and the 5 known pulsating ULXs (PULXs) in the sample display a blackbody luminosity among the lowest. These are consistent with the scenario that the soft emission originates from the photosphere of the optically thick wind. However, the derived blackbody luminosity for PULXs is significantly above the Eddington limit for neutron stars. A possible explanation is that a considerable fraction of the optically thick wind roots in the inner accretion flow, where the radiative flux could exceed the Eddington limit due to a reduced scattering cross-section or enhanced radiation transfer with magnetic buoyancy. Based on a wind model, the inferred mass accretion rate in these standard ULXs overlaps but is on average lower than that in luminous and very soft X-ray sources, which are also candidates with supercritical accretion. Alternatively, it cannot be ruled out that the soft emission component is a result of the hard component, e.g., via down-scattering in a cool medium, as a weak correlation may exist between them.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.