Paper detail

Linking pressure gradients with the stability of molecular clouds in galactic outflows

The jets launched by actively accreting black holes are capable of launching several of the massive (million or billion solar mass) molecular outflows observed in galaxies. These outflows could suppress or enhance star formation in galaxies. To investigate the stability of clouds capable to form stars in outflows, we modeled CO and HCO+ ALMA data of the galaxy IC5063, in which black-hole jets impact molecular clouds. Using a radiative transfer code that self-consistently performs astrochemical and thermal balance calculations based on the available gas heating sources, we found that mechanical heating and cosmic ray (CR) heating are fully capable of individually reproducing the data. In our best-fit model, CRs provide about 1/3rd of the dense gas heating at the radio lobes, emphasizing the role of this often neglected mechanism in heating the gas and potentially generating outflows. The gas temperature and density indicate that the jet passage leads to an increase of about 1 order of magnitude in the internal pressure Pi of molecular clouds (with Pi/k from 8*10^5 up to 7*10^6 K cm^-3), irrespective of the excitation mechanism. From the fluxes of [S II] and [N II] lines in VLT MUSE data, the external pressure Pe of molecular clouds increases in several regions enough to exceed Pi. This result leads us to conclude that we are observing the expansion of an ionized overpressurized cocoon that compresses molecular clouds and that could lead to their collapse. Some jet-impacted clouds, nonetheless, near pathways that the jet cleared have increased Pi and decreased Pe. They are likely to undergo evaporation of their outer layers. Part of the evaporated layers could mass load the outflow thanks to ram pressure from co-spatial ionized gas flows. The observed pressure changes thus suggest that both star formation enhancement and suppression could simultaneously occur.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.