Paper detail

Link Level Performance Comparison of C-V2X and ITS-G5 for Vehicular Channel Models

V2X communications plays a significant role in increasing traffic safety and efficiency by enabling vehicles to exchange their status information with other vehicles and traffic entities in their proximity. In this regard, two technologies emerged as the main contenders for enabling V2X communications which have stringent requirements in terms of latency and reliability due to their apparent safety criticality. The first one is the DSRC standard (referred to as ITS-G5 in Europe) that is well researched since 20 years and has attained enough technical maturity for current deployment. The second one is the relatively new CV2X standard that is nevertheless, based on the 3GPP standard family that have successful deployments in almost every corner of the globe. In this work, we compare the link level performance of the PHY protocols for both the technologies for different vehicular fading channel models. To this end, we construct and simulate the PHY pipelines and show the performance results by means of BLER} versus SNR graphs. Our investigations show that CV2X performs better than ITS-G5 for almost all the considered channel models due to better channel coding and estimation schemes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.