Paper detail

Lines, betweenness and metric spaces

A classic theorem of Euclidean geometry asserts that any noncollinear set of $n$ points in the plane determines at least $n$ distinct lines. Chen and Chvátal conjectured that this holds for an arbitrary finite metric space, with a certain natural definition of lines in a metric space. We prove that in any metric space with $n$ points, either there is a line containing all the points or there are at least $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ lines. This is the first polynomial lower bound on the number of lines in general finite metric spaces. In the more general setting of pseudometric betweenness, we prove a corresponding bound of $Ω(n^{2/5})$ lines. When the metric space is induced by a connected graph, we prove that either there is a line containing all the points or there are $Ω(n^{4/7})$ lines, improving the previous $Ω(n^{2/7})$ bound. We also prove that the number of lines in an $n$-point metric space is at least $n / 5w$, where $w$ is the number of different distances in the space, and we give an $Ω(n^{4/3})$ lower bound on the number of lines in metric spaces induced by graphs with constant diameter, as well as spaces where all the positive distances are from \{1, 2, 3\}.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.