Paper detail

Linearly-Coupled Fountain Codes

Network-coded multiple access (NCMA) is a communication scheme for wireless multiple-access networks where physical-layer network coding (PNC) is employed. In NCMA, a user encodes and spreads its message into multiple packets. Time is slotted and multiple users transmit packets (one packet each) simultaneously in each timeslot. A sink node aims to decode the messages of all the users from the sequence of receptions over successive timeslots. For each timeslot, the NCMA receiver recovers multiple linear combinations of the packets transmitted in that timeslot, forming a system of linear equations. Different systems of linear equations are recovered in different timeslots. A message decoder then recovers the original messages of all the users by jointly solving multiple systems of linear equations obtained over different timeslots. We propose a low-complexity digital fountain approach for this coding problem, where each source node encodes its message into a sequence of packets using a fountain code. The aforementioned systems of linear equations recovered by the NCMA receiver effectively couple these fountain codes together. We refer to the coupling of the fountain codes as a linearly-coupled (LC) fountain code. The ordinary belief propagation (BP) decoding algorithm for conventional fountain codes is not optimal for LC fountain codes. We propose a batched BP decoding algorithm and analyze the convergence of the algorithm for general LC fountain codes. We demonstrate how to optimize the degree distributions and show by numerical results that the achievable rate region is nearly optimal. Our approach significantly reduces the decoding complexity compared with the previous NCMA schemes based on Reed-Solomon codes and random linear codes, and hence has the potential to increase throughput and decrease delay in computation-limited NCMA systems.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.