Paper detail

Linearized iterative least-squares (LIL): A parameter fitting algorithm for component separation in multifrequency CMB experiments such as Planck

We present an efficient algorithm for the least squares parameter fitting optimized for component separation in multi-frequency CMB experiments. We sidestep some of the problems associated with non-linear optimization by taking advantage of the quasi-linear nature of the foreground model. We demonstrate our algorithm, linearized iterative least-squares (LIL), on the publicly available Planck sky model FFP6 simulations and compare our result with the other algorithms. We work at full Planck resolution and show that degrading the resolution of all channels to that of the lowest frequency channel is not necessary. Finally we present results for the publicly available Planck data. Our algorithm is extremely fast, fitting 6 parameters to 7 lowest Planck channels at full resolution (50 million pixels) in less than 160 CPU-minutes (or few minutes running in parallel on few tens of cores). LIL is therefore easily scalable to future experiments which may have even higher resolution and more frequency channels. We also naturally propagate the uncertainties in different parameters due to noise in the maps as well as degeneracies between the parameters to the final errors on the parameters using Fisher matrix. One indirect application of LIL could be a front-end for Bayesian parameter fitting to find the maximum of the likelihood to be used as the starting point for the Gibbs sampling. We show for rare components, such as the carbon-monoxide emission, present in small fraction of sky, the optimal approach should combine parameter fitting with model selection. LIL may also be useful in other astrophysical applications which satisfy the quasi-linearity criteria.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.