Paper detail

Linearizations for interpolation bases -- a comparison I

One strategy to solve a nonlinear eigenvalue problem $T(λ)x=0$ is to solve a polynomial eigenvalue problem (PEP) $P(λ)x=0$ that approximates the original problem through interpolation. Then, this PEP is usually solved by linearization. Most of the literature about linearizations assumes that $P(λ)$ is expressed in the monomial basis but, because of the polynomial approximation techniques, in this context, $P(λ)$ is expressed in a non-monomial basis. The bases used with most frequency are the Chebyshev basis, the Newton basis and the Lagrange basis. In this paper we construct a family of linearizations of $P(λ)$ that is easy to construct from the matrix coefficients of $P(λ)$ when this polynomial is expressed in any of those three bases. We also provide recovery formulas of eigenvectors (when $P(λ)$ is regular) and recovery formulas of minimal bases and minimal indices (when $P(λ)$ is singular). Our ultimate goal is to compare the numerical behavior of these linearizations, within the same family (to select the best one) and with the linearizations of other families based on the location of the eigenvalues with respect to the interpolation nodes.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.