Paper detail

Linearity of regression for weak records, revisited

Since many years characterization of distribution by linearity of regression of non-adjacent weak records E(W_{i+s}|W_i) = β_1 W_i+β_0 for discrete observations has been known to be a difficult question. Lopez- Blazquez (2004) proposed an interesting idea of reducing it to the adjacent case and claimed to have the characterization problem completely solved. We will explain that, unfortunately, there is a major aw in the proof given in that paper. This aw is related to fact that in some situations the operator responsible for reduction of the non-adjacent case to the adjacent one is not injective. The operator is trivially injective when 0<β_1<1. We show that when β_1>=1 the operator is injective when s = 2, 3, 4. Therefore in these cases the method proposed by Lopez-Blazquez is valid. We also show that the operator is not injective when β_1 >=1 and s >= 5. Consequently, in this case the reduction methodology does not work and thus the characterization problem remains open.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.