Paper detail

Linearity and Complements in Projective Space

The projective space of order $n$ over the finite field $\Fq$, denoted here as $\Ps$, is the set of all subspaces of the vector space $\Fqn$. The projective space can be endowed with distance function $d_S(X,Y) = \dim(X) + \dim(Y) - 2\dim(X\cap Y)$ which turns $\Ps$ into a metric space. With this, \emph{an $(n,M,d)$ code $\C$ in projective space} is a subset of $\Ps$ of size $M$ such that the distance between any two codewords (subspaces) is at least $d$. Koetter and Kschischang recently showed that codes in projective space are precisely what is needed for error-correction in networks: an $(n,M,d)$ code can correct $t$ packet errors and $ρ$ packet erasures introduced (adversarially) anywhere in the network as long as $2t + 2ρ< d$. This motivates new interest in such codes. In this paper, we examine the two fundamental concepts of \myemph{complements} and \myemph{linear codes} in the context of $\Ps$. These turn out to be considerably more involved than their classical counterparts. These concepts are examined from two different points of view, coding theory and lattice theory. Our discussion reveals some surprised phenomena of these concepts in $\Ps$ and leaves some interesting problems for further research.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.