Paper detail

Linear-time Erasure List-decoding of Expander Codes

We give a linear-time erasure list-decoding algorithm for expander codes. More precisely, let $r > 0$ be any integer. Given an inner code $C_0$ of length $d$, and a $d$-regular bipartite expander graph $G$ with $n$ vertices on each side, we give an algorithm to list-decode the expander code $C = C(G, C_0)$ of length $nd$ from approximately $δδ_r nd$ erasures in time $n \cdot \mathrm{poly}(d2^r / δ)$, where $δ$ and $δ_r$ are the relative distance and the $r$'th generalized relative distance of $C_0$, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first linear-time algorithm that can list-decode expander codes from erasures beyond their (designed) distance of approximately $δ^2 nd$. To obtain our results, we show that an approach similar to that of (Hemenway and Wootters, Information and Computation, 2018) can be used to obtain such an erasure-list-decoding algorithm with an exponentially worse dependence of the running time on $r$ and $δ$; then we show how to improve the dependence of the running time on these parameters.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.