Paper detail

Linear stability of magnetic vortex chains in a plasma in the presence of equilibrium electron temperature anisotropy

The linear stability of chains of magnetic vortices in a plasma is investigated analytically in two dimensions by means of a reduced fluid model assuming a strong guide field and accounting for equilibrium electron temperature anisotropy. The chain of magnetic vortices is modelled by means of the classical "cat's eyes" solutions and the linear stability is studied by analysing the second variation of a conserved functional, according to the Energy-Casimir method. The stability analysis is carried out on the domain bounded by the separatrices of the vortices. Two cases are considered, corresponding to a ratio between perpendicular equilibrium ion and electron temperature much greater or much less than unity, respectively. In the former case, equilibrium flows depend on an arbitrary function. Stability is attained if the equilibrium electron temperature anisotropy is bounded from above and from below, with the lower bound corresponding to the condition preventing the firehose instability. A further condition sets an upper limit to the amplitude of the vortices, for a given choice of the equilibrium flow. For cold ions, two sub-cases have to be considered. In the first one, equilibria correspond to those for which the velocity field is proportional to the local Alfvén velocity. Stability conditions imply: an upper limit on the amplitude of the flow, which automatically implies firehose stability, an upper bound on the electron temperature anisotropy and again an upper bound on the size of the vortices. The second sub-case refers to equilibrium electrostatic potentials which are not constant on magnetic flux surfaces and the resulting stability conditions correspond to those of the first sub-case in the absence of flow.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.