Paper detail

Linear Sketching over $\mathbb F_2$

We initiate a systematic study of linear sketching over $\mathbb F_2$. For a given Boolean function $f \colon \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ a randomized $\mathbb F_2$-sketch is a distribution $\mathcal M$ over $d \times n$ matrices with elements over $\mathbb F_2$ such that $\mathcal Mx$ suffices for computing $f(x)$ with high probability. We study a connection between $\mathbb F_2$-sketching and a two-player one-way communication game for the corresponding XOR-function. Our results show that this communication game characterizes $\mathbb F_2$-sketching under the uniform distribution (up to dependence on error). Implications of this result include: 1) a composition theorem for $\mathbb F_2$-sketching complexity of a recursive majority function, 2) a tight relationship between $\mathbb F_2$-sketching complexity and Fourier sparsity, 3) lower bounds for a certain subclass of symmetric functions. We also fully resolve a conjecture of Montanaro and Osborne regarding one-way communication complexity of linear threshold functions by designing an $\mathbb F_2$-sketch of optimal size. Furthermore, we show that (non-uniform) streaming algorithms that have to process random updates over $\mathbb F_2$ can be constructed as $\mathbb F_2$-sketches for the uniform distribution with only a minor loss. In contrast with the previous work of Li, Nguyen and Woodruff (STOC'14) who show an analogous result for linear sketches over integers in the adversarial setting our result doesn't require the stream length to be triply exponential in $n$ and holds for streams of length $\tilde O(n)$ constructed through uniformly random updates. Finally, we state a conjecture that asks whether optimal one-way communication protocols for XOR-functions can be constructed as $\mathbb F_2$-sketches with only a small loss.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.