Paper detail

Linear relations, monodromy and Jordan cells of a circle valued map

In this paper we consider the definition of " monodromy of an angle valued map" based on linear relations as proposed in Burghelea-Haller (3). This definition provides an alternative treatment of monodromy and computationally an alternative calculation of the "Jordan cells", topological persistence invariants of a circle valued maps introduced in Burghelea-Day (2). We give a new geometric proof that the monodromy is actually a homotopy invariant of a pair consisting of a compact ANR and an integral degree one cohomology class without any reference to the infinite cyclic cover associated to cohomology class as in (3), or to the graph representation associated an angle valued map defining the cohomology class as in (2). Most important, we describe an algorithm to calculate the monodromy for a simplicial angle valued map defined on a finite simplicial complex, providing a new algorithm for the calculation of the Jordan cells of the map, shorter than the one proposed in (2). We indicate the computational usefulness of "Jordan cells", and in particular of the proposed algorithm, for the calculation of other basic topological invariants of the pair.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.