Paper detail

Linear Logic without Units

We study categorical models for the unitless fragment of multiplicative linear logic. We find that the appropriate notion of model is a special kind of promonoidal category. Since the theory of promonoidal categories has not been developed very thoroughly, at least in the published literature, we need to develop it here. The most natural way to do this - and the simplest, once the (substantial) groundwork has been laid - is to consider promonoidal categories as an instance of the general theory of pseudomonoids in a monoidal bicategory. Accordingly, we describe and explain the notions of monoidal bicategory and pseudomonoid therein. The higher-dimensional nature of monoidal bicategories presents serious notational difficulties, since to use the natural analogue of the commutative diagrams used in ordinary category theory would require the use of three-dimensional diagrams. We therefore introduce a novel technical device, which we dub the calculus of components, that simplifies the business of reasoning about a certain class of algebraic structure internal to a monoidal bicategory. When viewed through this simplifying lens, the theory of pseudomonoids turns out to be essentially formally identical to the ordinary theory of monoidal categories. We indicate how the calculus of components may be extended to cover structures that make use of the braiding in a braided monoidal bicategory, and use this to study braided pseudomonoids. A higher-dimensional analogue of Cayley's theorem is proved, and used to deduce a novel characterisation of the unit of a promonoidal category. This, and the other preceding work, is then used to give two characterisations of the categories that model the unitless fragment of intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic. Finally we consider the non-intuitionistic case, where the second characterisation in particular takes a surprisingly simple form.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.