Paper detail

Linear Index Coding via Graph Homomorphism

It is known that the minimum broadcast rate of a linear index code over $\mathbb{F}_q$ is equal to the $minrank_q$ of the underlying digraph. In [3] it is proved that for $\mathbb{F}_2$ and any positive integer $k$, $minrank_q(G)\leq k$ iff there exists a homomorphism from the complement of the graph $G$ to the complement of a particular undirected graph family called "graph family $\{G_k\}$". As observed in [2], by combining these two results one can relate the linear index coding problem of undirected graphs to the graph homomorphism problem. In [4], a direct connection between linear index coding problem and graph homomorphism problem is introduced. In contrast to the former approach, the direct connection holds for digraphs as well and applies to any field size. More precisely, in [4], a graph family $\{H_k^q\}$ is introduced and shown that whether or not the scalar linear index of a digraph $G$ is less than or equal to $k$ is equivalent to the existence of a graph homomorphism from the complement of $G$ to the complement of $H_k^q$. Here, we first study the structure of the digraphs $H_k^q$. Analogous to the result of [2] about undirected graphs, we prove that $H_k^q$'s are vertex transitive digraphs. Using this, and by applying a lemma of Hell and Nesetril [5], we derive a class of necessary conditions for digraphs $G$ to satisfy $lind_q(G)\leq k$. Particularly, we obtain new lower bounds on $lind_q(G)$. Our next result is about the computational complexity of scalar linear index of a digraph. It is known that deciding whether the scalar linear index of an undirected graph is equal to $k$ or not is NP-complete for $k\ge 3$ and is polynomially decidable for $k=1,2$ [3]. For digraphs, it is shown in [6] that for the binary alphabet, the decision problem for $k=2$ is NP-complete. We use graph homomorphism framework to extend this result to arbitrary alphabet.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.