Paper detail

Linear convergence of the Randomized Sparse Kaczmarz Method

The randomized version of the Kaczmarz method for the solution of linear systems is known to converge linearly in expectation. In this work we extend this result and show that the recently proposed Randomized Sparse Kaczmarz method for recovery of sparse solutions, as well as many variants, also converges linearly in expectation. The result is achieved in the framework of split feasibility problems and their solution by randomized Bregman projections with respect to strongly convex functions. To obtain the expected convergence rates we prove extensions of error bounds for projections. The convergence result is shown to hold in more general settings involving smooth convex functions, piecewise linear-quadratic functions and also the regularized nuclear norm, which is used in the area of low rank matrix problems. Numerical experiments indicate that the Randomized Sparse Kaczmarz method provides advantages over both the non-randomized and the non-sparse Kaczmarz methods for the solution of over- and under-determined linear systems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.