Paper detail

Linear acceleration emission: 1 Motion in a large amplitude electrostatic wave

We consider the motion of a charge in a large amplitude electrostatic wave with a triangular wave form relevant to an oscillating model of a pulsar magnetosphere. The (one-dimensional) orbit of a particle in such a wave is found exactly in terms of Weierstrass functions. The result is used to discuss linear acceleration emission (at both low and high frequencies) in an oscillating model for pulsars. An explicit expression for the emissivity is derived in an accompanying paper (Melrose & Luo 2009), and used here to derive an expression for the absorption coefficient at low frequencies. We show that absorption can be negative, corresponding to maser emission. For the large amplitude required to trigger pair creation in an oscillating model, the rate of the maser growth is too small to be effective. Effective growth requires smaller amplitudes, such that the maximum Lorentz factor gained by acceleration in the wave is $\lapprox10$.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.