Paper detail

Line bundles in supersymmetric coset models

The scalars of an N = 1 supersymmetric sigma-model in 4 dimensions parameterize a Kaehler manifold. The transformations of their fermionic superpartners under the isometries are often anomalous. These anomalies can be canceled by introducing additional chiral multiplets with appropriate charges. To obtain the right charges a non-trivial singlet compensating multiplet can be used. However when the topology of the underlying Kaehler manifold is non-trivial, the consistency of this multiplet requires that its charge is quantized. This singlet can be interpreted as a section of a line bundle. We determine the Kaehler potentials corresponding to the minimal non-trivial singlet chiral superfields for any compact Kaehlerian coset space G/H. The quantization condition may be in conflict with the requirement of anomaly cancelation. To illustrate this, we discuss the consistency of anomaly free models based on the coset spaces E_6/SO(10)xU(1) and SU(5)/SU(2)xU(1)xSU(3).

preprint2000arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.