Paper detail

Line bundles associated with normal surface singularities

Recently L. Nicolaescu and the author formulated a conjecture which relates the geometric genus of a complex analytic normal surface singularity (whose link $M$ is a rational homology sphere) with the Seiberg-Witten invariant of $M$ associated with the ``canonical'' $spin^c$ structure of $M$. Since the Seiberg-Witten theory of the link $M$ provides a rational number for any $spin^c$ structure it was a natural challenge to search for a complete set of conjecturally valid identities, which involve all the Seiberg-Witten invariants (giving an analytic -- i.e. singularity theoretical -- interpretation of them). The formulation of this set of identities is one of the goals of the present article. In fact, we formulate conjecturally valid inequalities which became equalities in special rigid situations. In this way, the Seiberg-Witten invariants determine optimal topological upper bounds for the dimensions of the first sheaf-cohomology of line bundles living on the resolution. Moreover, for $\Q$-Gorenstein singularities and some ``natural'' line bundles equality holds. The first part of the article constructs these ``natural'' holomorphic line bundles. The line-bundle construction is compatible with abelian covers. This allows us to reformulate the conjecture in its second version which relates the echivariant geometric genus (associated with the universal abelian cover of the singular germ) with the Seiberg-Witten invariants of the link $M$. In the last section we verify the conjecture for rational singularities.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.