Paper detail

Limits on the validity of the semiclassical theory

For want of a more natural proposal, it is generally assumed that the back-reaction of a quantised matter field on a classical metric is given by the expectation value of its energy-momentum tensor, evaluated in a specified state. This proposal can be expected to be quite sound only when the fluctuations in the energy-momentum tensor of the quantum field are negligible. Based on this condition, a dimensionless criterion has been suggested earlier by Kuo and Ford for drawing the limits on the validity of this semiclassical theory. In this paper, we examine this criterion for the case of a toy model, constructed with two degrees of freedom and a coupling between them that exactly mimics the behaviour of a scalar field in a Friedmann universe. To reproduce the semiclassical regime of the field theory, in the toy model, one of degrees of freedom is assumed to be classical and the other quantum mechanical. Also the backreaction is assumed to be given by the expectation values of the quantum operators involved in the equations of motion for the classical system. Motivated by the same physical reasoning as Kuo and Ford, we, here, suggest another criterion, one which will be shown to perform more reliably as we evaluate these criterions for different states of the quantum system in the toy model. Finally, from the results obtained we conclude that the semiclassical theory being considered for the toy model is reliable, during all stages of its evolution, only if the quantum system is specified to be in coherent like states. The implications of these investigations on field theory are discussed.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.