Paper detail

Limits on the cosmic neutrino background

We present the first comprehensive discussion of constraints on the cosmic neutrino background (C$ν$B) overdensity, including theoretical, experimental and cosmological limits for a wide range of neutrino masses and temperatures. Additionally, we calculate the sensitivities of future direct and indirect relic neutrino detection experiments and compare the results with the existing constraints, extending several previous analyses by taking into account that the C$ν$B reference frame may not be aligned with that of the Earth. The Pauli exclusion principle strongly disfavours overdensities $η_ν\gg 1$ at small neutrino masses, but allows for overdensities $η_ν\lesssim 125$ at the KATRIN mass bound $m_ν \simeq 0.8\,\mathrm{eV}$. On the other hand, cosmology strongly favours $0.2 \lesssim η_ν \lesssim 3.5$ in all scenarios. We find that direct detection proposals are capable of observing the C$ν$B without a significant overdensity for neutrino masses $m_ν \gtrsim 50\,\mathrm{meV}$, but require an overdensity $η_ν \gtrsim 3\times 10^5$ outside of this range. We also demonstrate that relic neutrino detection proposals are sensitive to the helicity composition of the C$ν$B, whilst some may be able to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.