Paper detail

Limits on non-canonical heating and turbulence in the intergalactic medium from the low redshift Lyman-alpha forest

We examine the column density distribution function (CDDF) and Doppler parameter distribution from hydrodynamical simulations and Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS) observations of the Lyman-alpha forest at redshift $0\leq z\leq 0.2$. Allowing for a factor of two uncertainty in the metagalactic HI photoionisation rate, our hydrodynamical simulations are in good agreement ($1$-$1.5σ$) with the shape and amplitude of the observed CDDF at HI column densities $10^{13.3}\rm\,cm^{-2}\leq N_{\rm HI}\leq 10^{14.5}\rm\,cm^{-2}$. However, the Doppler widths of the simulated lines remain too narrow with respect to the COS data. We argue that invoking AGN feedback does not resolve this discrepancy. We also disfavour enhanced photoheating rates as a potential solution, as this requires an unphysically hard UV background spectrum. If instead appealing to a non-canonical source of heating, an additional specific heat injection of $u \lesssim 6.9\rm\,eV\,m_{\rm p}^{-1}$ is required at $z\lesssim 2.5$ for gas that has $N_{\rm HI}\simeq 10^{13.5}\rm\,cm^{-2}$ by $z=0.1$. Alternatively, there may be an unresolved line of sight turbulent velocity component of $v_{\rm turb}\lesssim 8.5\rm\,km\,s^{-1}(N_{\rm HI}/10^{13.5}\rm\,cm^{-2})^{0.21}$ for the coldest gas in the diffuse IGM.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.