Paper detail

Limiting alternative theories of gravity using gravitational wave observations across the spectrum

The advent of gravitational wave astronomy provides new proving grounds for testing theories of gravity. Recent work has reinvigorated the study of bimetric theories of gravity and massive gravity theories. One of the most interesting predictions of these theories, as well as some string theories, is the subluminal speed of propagating gravitational waves. Multi-messenger astronomy provides a unique opportunity to put limits on the difference (either positive or negative) between the propagation speed of electromagnetic and gravitational waves from these sources. This paper considers limits from multi-messenger cases across the planned measurable spectrum: first, the limits from isolated pulsars based on the current best limits from LIGO on gravitational wave emission, second, the limits from ultra-compact binaries that will be visible to a low-frequency space-based gravitational wave observatory like LISA, and third, limits from super massive black hole binaries using pulsar timing arrays. The required phase comparison between the electromagnetic signal and the gravitational wave signal is derived and, assuming a null result in that comparison, the current bounds on emission are used to place limits on alternative theories that exhibit propagation delays. Observations of the pulsars in the most sensitive range of LIGO could put an upper limit on the graviton mass as low as $10^{-38}\frac{eV}{c^{2}}$ and an upper limit on the fractional difference between the gravitational wave and electromagnetic wave speeds as low as $10^{-9}$. This paper shows results from the initial LIGO limit catalog of known pulsars. The bounds are stronger for binaries. A LISA-like mission bounds $m_{g}<10^{-40}\frac{eV}{c^{2}}$ and $δ<10^{-12}$. A PTA source gives even better bounds of $m_{g}<10^{-45}\frac{eV}{c^{2}}$ and $δ<10^{-14}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.