Paper detail

Limited-angle TOF-PET for intraoperative surgical applications: proof of concept and first experimental data

Intraoperative Gamma Probe (IPG) remains the current gold standard modality for sentinel lymph node identification and tumor removal in cancer patients. However, even alongside the optical dyes they do not meet with <5% false negative rates (FNR) requirement, a key metric suggested by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). We are aiming to reduce FNR by using time of flight (TOF) PET detector technology in the limited angle geometry system by using only two detector buckets in coincidence, where one small-area detector is placed above the patient and the other with larger detection-area, placed just under the patient bed. For proof of concept, we used two Hamamatsu TOF PET detector modules (C13500-4075YC-12) featuring 12x12 array of 4.2x4.2x20 mm3 LFS crystal pixels, one-one coupled to silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) pixels. Detector coincidence timing resolution (CTR) measured 271 ps FWHM for the whole detector. We 3D printed lesion phantom containing spheres with 2-10 mm in diameter, representing lymph nodes, and placed it inside a 10-liter warm background water phantom. Experimental results show that with sub-minute data acquisition, 6 mm diameter spheres can be identified in the image when a lesion phantom with 10:1 activity ratio to background is used. Simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental data, by resolving 6 mm diameters lesions with 60 seconds acquisition time, in 25 cm deep background water phantom with 10:1 activity ratio. The image quality improves as the CTR improves in the simulation, and with decreasing background water phantom depth or lesion to background activity ratio, in the experiment. With the results presented here we conclude that limited angle TOF PET detector is a major step forward for intraoperative applications in that, improved lesion detectability is beyond what the conventional Gamma- and NIR-based probes could achieve.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.