Limitations of the Standard Gravitational Perfect Fluid Paradigm

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Abstract

We show that the standard perfect fluid paradigm is not necessarily a valid description of a curved space steady state gravitational source. Simply by virtue of not being flat, curved space geometries have to possess intrinsic length scales, and such length scales can affect the fluid structure. For modes of wavelength of order or greater than such scales eikonalized geometrical optics cannot apply and rays are not geodesic. Covariantizing thus entails not only the replacing of flat space functions by covariant ones, but also the introduction of intrinsic scales that were absent in flat space. In principle it is thus unreliable to construct the curved space energy-momentum tensor as the covariant generalization of a geodesic-based flat spacetime energy-momentum tensor. By constructing the partition function as an incoherent average over a complete set of modes of a scalar field propagating in a curved space background, we show that for the specific case of a static, spherically symmetric geometry, the steady state energy-momentum tensor that ensues will in general be of the form Tμν=(ρ+p)UμUν+pgμν+πμνT_{μν}=(ρ+p)U_μU_ν+pg_{μν}+π_{μν} where the anisotropic πμνπ_{μν} is a symmetric, traceless rank two tensor which obeys Uμπμν=0U^μπ_{μν}=0. Such a πμνπ_{μν} type term is absent for an incoherently averaged steady state fluid in a spacetime where there are no intrinsic length scales, and in principle would thus be missed in a covariantizing of a flat spacetime TμνT_{μν}. While the significance of such πμνπ_{μν} type terms would need to be evaluated on a case by case basis, through the use of kinetic theory we reassuringly find that the effect of such πμνπ_{μν} type terms is small for weak gravity stars where perfect fluid sources are commonly used.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.