Paper detail

Limitations of Ordered Macroporous Battery Electrode Materials at High Charge and Discharge Rates

Adding porosity to battery electrodes is believed to be universally useful for adding space to accommodate volumetric expansion, electrolyte access to all active materials, helping to mitigate poor C-rate performance for thicker electrodes and for allowing infilling with other materials. Ordered porous electrode, such as inverse opals that have macroporosity, have been a model system: binder and conductive additive free, interconnected electrically, defined porosity and pore size with thickness, good electrolyte wettability and surprisingly good electrode performance in half cells and Li-battery cells at normal rates. We show that the intrinsic electronic conductivity is important, and at fast rates the intrinsic conductivity ultimately suppresses any charge storage in electrode materials. Using a model system of inverse opal V2O5in a flooded Li battery three-electrode cell, whose Li electrochemistry is very well understood, we show that beyond 10 C, electrodes can store almost no charge, but completely recover once reduced to < 1C. We show how the IO material is modified under lithiation using X-ray diffraction, Raman scattering and electron microscopy, and that little or no reaction occurs to the material at higher rates. We also use chronoamperometry to examine rate behaviour and link the limitations in high rate performance, and complete capacity suppression, to the intrinsic out-of-plane conductivity of the IO network. The data show that even idealized electrodes with nanoscale dimensions, functional porosity and full material interconnectivity, are fundamentally limited for high rate performance when they are less conductive even when fully soaked with electrolyte. While adding so-called functional size reduction, porosity etc. can be useful for some materials, these potential benefits are clearly not universally useful for high rate electrodes in Li-ion batteries.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.