Paper detail

Limitation of symmetry breaking by gravitational collapse: the revisit of Lin-Mestel-Shu instability

We revisit the topic of shape evolution during the spherical collapse of an $N$-body system. Our main objective is to investigate the critical particle number below which, during a gravitational collapse, the amplification of triaxiality from initial fluctuations is effective, and above which it is ineffective. To this aim, we develop the Lin-Mestel-Shu theory for a system of particles initially with isotropic velocity dispersion and with a simple power-law density profile. We first determine, for an unstable cloud, two radii corresponding to the balance of two opposing forces and their fluctuations: such radii fix the sizes of the non-collapsing region and the triaxial seed from density fluctuations. We hypothesize that the triaxial degree of the final state depends on which radius is dominant prior to the collapse phase leading to a different scheme of the self-consistent shape evolution of the core and the rest of the system. The condition where the two radii are equal therefore identifies the critical particle number, which can be expressed as the function of the parameters of initial state. In numerical work, we can pinpoint such a critical number by comparing the virialized flattening with the initial flattening. The difference between these two quantities agrees with the theoretical predictions only for the power-law density profiles with an exponent in the range $[0,0.25]$. For higher exponents, results suggest that the critical number is above the range of simulated $N$. We speculate that there is an additional mechanism, related to strong density gradients that increases further the flattening, requiring higher $N$ to further weaken the initial fluctuations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.