Paper detail

Likelihood-free Forward Modeling for Cluster Weak Lensing and Cosmology

Likelihood-free inference provides a rigorous approach to preform Bayesian analysis using forward simulations only. The main advantage of likelihood-free methods is its ability to account for complex physical processes and observational effects in forward simulations. Here we explore the potential of likelihood-free forward modeling for Bayesian cosmological inference using the redshift evolution of the cluster abundance combined with weak-lensing mass calibration. We use two complementary likelihood-free methods, namely Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) and Density-Estimation Likelihood-Free Inference (DELFI), to develop an analysis procedure for inference of the cosmological parameters $(Ω_\mathrm{m},σ_8)$ and the mass scale of the survey sample. Adopting an eROSITA-like selection function and a 10-percent scatter in the observable-mass relation in a flat $Λ$CDM cosmology with $Ω_\mathrm{m}=0.286$ and $σ_8=0.82$, we create a synthetic catalog of observable-selected NFW clusters in a survey area of 50 deg$^2$. The stacked tangential shear profile and the number counts in redshift bins are used as summary statistics for both methods. By performing a series of forward simulations, we obtain convergent solutions for the posterior distribution from both methods. We find that ABC recovers broader posteriors than DELFI, especially for the $Ω_\mathrm{m}$ parameter. For a weak-lensing survey with a source density of $n_\mathrm{g}=20$ arcmin$^{-2}$, we obtain posterior constraints on $S_8=σ_8(Ω_\mathrm{m}/0.3)^{0.3}$ of $0.836 \pm 0.032$ and $0.810 \pm 0.019$ from ABC and DELFI, respectively. The analysis framework developed in this study will be particularly powerful for cosmological inference with ongoing cluster cosmology programs, such as the XMM-XXL survey and the eROSITA all-sky survey, in combination with wide-field weak-lensing surveys.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.