Paper detail

Likelihood, Fisher information, and systematics of cosmic microwave background experiments

Every experiment is affected by systematic effects that hamper the data analysis and have the potential to ultimately degrade its performance. In the case of probes of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation, a minimal set of issues to consider includes asymmetric beam functions, correlated noise, and incomplete sky coverage. Presuming a simplified scanning strategy that allows for an exact analytical treatment of the problem, we study the impact of systematic effects on the likelihood function of the CMB power spectrum. We use the Fisher matrix, a measure of the information content of a data set, for a quantitative comparison of different experimental configurations. In addition, for various power spectrum coefficients, we explore the functional form of the likelihood directly, and obtain the following results: The likelihood function can deviate systematically from a Gaussian distribution up to the highest multipole values considered in our analysis. Treated exactly, realistic levels of asymmetric beam functions and correlated noise do not by themselves decrease the information yield of CMB experiments nor do they induce noticeable coupling between multipoles. Masking large fractions of the sky, on the other hand, results in a considerably more complex correlation structure of the likelihood function. Combining adjacent power spectrum coefficients into bins can partially mitigate these problems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.