Paper detail

Lightweight Monte Carlo Verification of Markov Decision Processes with Rewards

Markov decision processes are useful models of concurrency optimisation problems, but are often intractable for exhaustive verification methods. Recent work has introduced lightweight approximative techniques that sample directly from scheduler space, bringing the prospect of scalable alternatives to standard numerical model checking algorithms. The focus so far has been on optimising the probability of a property, but many problems require quantitative analysis of rewards. In this work we therefore present lightweight statistical model checking algorithms to optimise the rewards of Markov decision processes. We consider the standard definitions of rewards used in model checking, introducing an auxiliary hypothesis test to accommodate reachability rewards. We demonstrate the performance of our approach on a number of standard case studies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.