Paper detail

Light on Dark Matter with Weak Gravitational Lensing

This paper reviews statistical methods recently developed to reconstruct and analyze dark matter mass maps from weak lensing observations. The field of weak lensing is motivated by the observations made in the last decades showing that the visible matter represents only about 4-5% of the Universe, the rest being dark. The Universe is now thought to be mostly composed by an invisible, pressureless matter -potentially relic from higher energy theories- called "dark matter" (20-21%) and by an even more mysterious term, described in Einstein equations as a vacuum energy density, called "dark energy" (70%). This "dark" Universe is not well described or even understood, so this point could be the next breakthrough in cosmology. Weak gravitational lensing is believed to be the most promising tool to understand the nature of dark matter and to constrain the cosmological model used to describe the Universe. Gravitational lensing is the process in which light from distant galaxies is bent by the gravity of intervening mass in the Universe as it travels towards us. This bending causes the image of background galaxies to appear slightly distorted and can be used to extract significant results for cosmology. Future weak lensing surveys are already planned in order to cover a large fraction of the sky with large accuracy. However this increased accuracy also places greater demands on the methods used to extract the available information. In this paper, we will first describe the important steps of the weak lensing processing to reconstruct the dark matter distribution from shear estimation. Then we will discuss the problem of statistical estimation in order to set constraints on the cosmological model. We review the methods which are currently used especially new methods based on sparsity.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.