Paper detail

Light Curve Properties of Supernovae Associated With Gamma-ray Bursts

Little is known about the diversity in the light curves of GRB-SNe, including whether the light curve of SN 1998bw can be used as a representative template or whether there is a luminosity-decline rate relation akin to that of SNe Ia. In this paper, we aim to obtain well-constrained light curves of GRB-SNe without the assumption of empirical or parametric templates and to investigate whether the peak brightness correlates with other parameters such as the light curve shape or the time of peak. We select eight SNe in the redshift range 0.0085 to 0.606, which are firmly associated with GRBs. The light curves of these GRB-SNe are well sampled across the peak. Afterglow and host galaxy contributions are subtracted and dust reddening is corrected for. Low-order polynomial functions are fitted to the light curves. A K-correction is applied to transform the light curves into the rest frame V band. GRB-SNe follow a luminosity-decline rate relation similar to the Phillips relation for SNe Ia, with $M_{V,peak} = 1.59^{+0.28}_{-0.24} Δm_{V,15} - 20.61^{+0.19}_{-0.22}$, with $χ^2 = 5.2$ for 6 dof and $M_{V,peak}$ and $Δm_{V,15}$ being the peak magnitude and decline rate in V band. This luminosity-decline rate relation is tighter than the k-s relation, where k and s are the factors describing the relative brightness and width to the light curve of SN 1998bw. The peak luminosities of GRB-SNe are also correlated with the time of peak: the brighter the GRB-SN, the longer the rise time. The light curve of SN 1998bw stretched around the time of explosion can be used as a template for GRB-SNe with reasonable confidence, but stretching around the peak produces better results. The existence of such a relation provides a new constraint on GRB explosion models. GRB-SNe can be used as standardizable candles to measure cosmological distances and constrain cosmological parameters.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.