Paper detail

Light-by-light scattering cross-section measurements at LHC

This note represents an attempt to gather the input related to light-by-light scattering ($γγ$) cross-section measurements at LHC with the aim of checking the consistency with different standard model predictions. For the first time, we also consider the contribution from the $η_b(1S)$ meson production to the diphoton invariant mass distribution, by calculating its inclusive photoproduction cross-section. Using a simplified set of assumptions, we find a result of $115\pm 19\,\,\text{nb}$, consistent with standard model predictions within two standard deviations. Although an improved determination of the integrated fiducial $\textrm{PbPb}\,(γγ)\to \textrm{Pb}^{(\ast)}\textrm{+}\textrm{Pb}^{(\ast)}\,γγ$ cross-section by approximately 10\% could be potentially achieved relative to current measurements, further improvements are expected with the inclusion of existing or forthcoming LHC nuclear data.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.