Paper detail

Lifting Grains by the Transient Low Pressure in a Martian Dust Devil

Lifting dust and sand into the thin Martian atmosphere is a challenging problem. Atmospheric pressure excursions within dust devils have been proposed to support lifting. We verify this idea in laboratory experiments. Pressure differences up to a few Pa are applied along particle layers of 50 to 400 $\rm μm$. As samples we used glass beads of $\sim$50 $\rm μm$ diameter and irregular basalt grains of $\sim$20 $\rm μm$ in size. The total ambient pressure of air was set to 600 Pa. Particles are ejected at pressure differences as low as 2.0 $\rm \pm$ 0.8 Pa. In the case of glass beads, the ejected grains returning to the particle bed can trigger new particle ejections as they reduce cohesion and release the tension from other grains. Therefore, few impacting grains might be sufficient to sustain dust lifting in a dust devil at even lower pressure differences. Particle lift requires a very thin, $\sim$100 $\rm μm$, low permeability particle layer on top of supporting ground with larger pore space. Assuming this, our experiments support the idea that pressure excursions in Martian dust devils release grains from the ground.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.