Paper detail

Lie symmetries, reduction and exact solutions of the (1+2)-dimensional nonlinear problem

The well known nonlinear model for describing the solid tumour growth [Byrne HM., et al. Appl Math Letters 2003;16:567-74] is under study using an approach based on Lie symmetries. It is shown that the model in the two-dimensional (in space) approximation forms a (1+2)-dimensional boundary value problem, which admits a highly nontrivial Lie symmetry. The special case involving the power-law nonlinearities is examined in details. The symmetries derived are applied for the reduction of the nonlinear boundary value problem in question to problems of lower dimensionality. Finally, the reduced problems with correctly-specified coefficients were exactly solved and the exact solutions derived were analysed, in particular, some plots were build in order to understand the time-space behaviour of these solutions and to discuss their biological interpretation.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.