Paper detail

Liberté et accumulation

The principle of Batyrev and Manin and its variants gives a precise conjectural interpretation for the dominant term for the number of points of bounded height on an algebraic variety for which the opposite of the canonical line bundle is sufficiently positive. As was clearly shown by the counter-example of Batyrev and Tschinkel, the implementation of this principle requires the exclusion of accumulating domains which, are found most of the time by using an induction procedure on the dimension of the variety. However this method does not yield a direct characterisation of the points to be excluded. The aim of this paper is to propose a measure of freedom for rational points so that the points with sufficiently positive freedom are randomly distributed on the variety according to a probability measure on the adelic space introduced by the author in a previous paper. From that point of view the rational points which are sufficiently free ought be the ones which respect the principle of Batyrev and Manin.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.