Paper detail

LibDB: An Effective and Efficient Framework for Detecting Third-Party Libraries in Binaries

Third-party libraries (TPLs) are reused frequently in software applications for reducing development cost. However, they could introduce security risks as well. Many TPL detection methods have been proposed to detect TPL reuse in Android bytecode or in source code. This paper focuses on detecting TPL reuse in binary code, which is a more challenging task. For a detection target in binary form, libraries may be compiled and linked to separate dynamic-link files or built into a fused binary that contains multiple libraries and project-specific code. This could result in fewer available code features and lower the effectiveness of feature engineering. In this paper, we propose a binary TPL reuse detection framework, LibDB, which can effectively and efficiently detect imported TPLs even in stripped and fused binaries. In addition to the basic and coarse-grained features (string literals and exported function names), LibDB utilizes function contents as a new type of feature. It embeds all functions in a binary file to low-dimensional representations with a trained neural network. It further adopts a function call graph-based comparison method to improve the accuracy of the detection. LibDB is able to support version identification of TPLs contained in the detection target, which is not considered by existing detection methods. To evaluate the performance of LibDB, we construct three datasets for binary-based TPL reuse detection. Our experimental results show that LibDB is more accurate and efficient than state-of-the-art tools on the binary TPL detection task and the version identification task. Our datasets and source code used in this work are anonymously available at https://github.com/DeepSoftwareAnalytics/LibDB.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.