Paper detail

Leveraging Natural Supervision for Language Representation Learning and Generation

Recent breakthroughs in Natural Language Processing (NLP) have been driven by language models trained on a massive amount of plain text. While powerful, deriving supervision from textual resources is still an open question. For example, language model pretraining often neglects the rich, freely-available structures in textual data. In this thesis, we describe three lines of work that seek to improve the training and evaluation of neural models using naturally-occurring supervision. We first investigate self-supervised training losses to help enhance the performance of pretrained language models for various NLP tasks. Specifically, we alter the sentence prediction loss to make it better suited to other pretraining losses and more challenging to solve. We design an intermediate finetuning step that uses self-supervised training to promote models' ability in cross-task generalization. Then we describe methods to leverage the structures in Wikipedia and paraphrases. In particular, we propose training losses to exploit hyperlinks, article structures, and article category graphs for entity-, discourse-, entailment-related knowledge. We propose a framework that uses paraphrase pairs to disentangle semantics and syntax in sentence representations. We extend the framework for a novel generation task that controls the syntax of output text with a sentential exemplar. Lastly, we discuss our work on tailoring textual resources for establishing challenging evaluation tasks. We introduce three datasets by defining novel tasks using various fan-contributed websites, including a long-form data-to-text generation dataset, a screenplay summarization dataset, and a long-form story generation dataset. These datasets have unique characteristics offering challenges to future work in their respective task settings.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.