Paper detail

Leveraging Cognitive Search Patterns to Enhance Automated Natural Language Retrieval Performance

The search of information in large text repositories has been plagued by the so-called document-query vocabulary gap, i.e. the semantic discordance between the contents in the stored document entities on the one hand and the human query on the other hand. Over the past two decades, a significant body of works has advanced technical retrieval prowess while several studies have shed light on issues pertaining to human search behavior. We believe that these efforts should be conjoined, in the sense that automated retrieval systems have to fully emulate human search behavior and thus consider the procedure according to which users incrementally enhance their initial query. To this end, cognitive reformulation patterns that mimic user search behaviour are highlighted and enhancement terms which are statistically collocated with or lexical-semantically related to the original terms adopted in the retrieval process. We formalize the application of these patterns by considering a query conceptual representation and introducing a set of operations allowing to operate modifications on the initial query. A genetic algorithm-based weighting process allows placing emphasis on terms according to their conceptual role-type. An experimental evaluation on real-world datasets against relevance, language, conceptual and knowledge-based models is conducted. We also show, when compared to language and relevance models, a better performance in terms of mean average precision than a word embedding-based model instantiation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.