Paper detail

Leverage Point Identification Method for LAV-Based State Estimation

The state estimation problem can be solved through different methods. In terms of robustness, an effective approach is represented by the Least Absolute Value (LAV) estimator, though vulnerable to leverage points. Based on a previously proposed theorem, in this paper we enunciate, and rigorously demonstrate, a new lemma that proves the identifiability of leverage points in LAV-based state estimation. On the basis of these theoretical foundations, we propose an algorithm for leverage point identification whose performance is validated by means of extensive numerical simulations and compared against more traditional approaches, like Projection Statistics (PS). The obtained results confirm that the proposed method outperforms PS and represents a significant enhancement for LAV-based state estimators as it correctly identifies all the leverage points, independently of the accuracy or the presence of measurement gross errors. A dedicated application example with respect to power system state estimation is finally included and discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.