Paper detail

Leverage on small-scale primordial non-Gaussianity through cross-correlations between CMB $E$-mode and $μ$-distortion anisotropies

Multi-field inflation models and non-Bunch-Davies vacuum initial conditions both predict sizeable non-Gaussian primordial perturbations and anisotropic $μ$-type spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) blackbody. While CMB anisotropies allow us to probe non-Gaussianity at wavenumbers $k\simeq 0.05\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$, $μ$-distortion anisotropies are related to non-Gaussianity of primordial perturbation modes with much larger wavenumbers, $k\simeq 740\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$. Through cross-correlations between CMB and $μ$-distortion anisotropies, one can therefore shed light on the aforementioned inflation models. We investigate the ability of a future CMB satellite imager like LiteBIRD to measure $μT$ and $μE$ cross-power spectra between anisotropic $μ$-distortions and CMB temperature and $E$-mode polarization anisotropies in the presence of foregrounds, and derive LiteBIRD forecasts on ${f_{\rm NL}^μ(k\simeq 740\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}})}$. We show that $μE$ cross-correlations with CMB polarization provide more constraining power on $f_{\rm NL}^μ$ than $μT$ cross-correlations in the presence of foregrounds, and the joint combination of $μT$ and $μE$ observables adds further leverage to the detection of small-scale primordial non-Gaussianity. We find that LiteBIRD would detect ${f_{\rm NL}^μ}=4500$ at $5σ$ significance after foreground removal, and achieve a minimum error of ${σ(f_{\rm NL}^μ=0) \simeq 800}$ at 68\% CL by combining CMB temperature and polarization. Due to the huge dynamic range of wavenumbers between CMB and $μ$-distortion anisotropies, such large $f^μ_{\rm NL}$ values would still be consistent with current CMB constraints in the case of very mild scale-dependence of primordial non-Gaussianity. Anisotropic spectral distortions thus provide a new path, complementary to CMB $B$-modes, to probe inflation with LiteBIRD.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.